Forked

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

drinking problem

individuals who drank more than two standard drinks a day for men and one drink a day for women were particularly at risk of alcohol-related cancers

    • #cancer
    • #alcohol
    • #drugs
  • 1 year ago
  • 3
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Cell Phone Radiation Could Hurt you in a few different of ways

So first, let’s go over the conventional argument that cell phones are safe…

So the radiation emitted by cell phones does not have enough energy to ionize atoms because its frequency is too low.

If the frequency of electromagnetic radiation is high enough, photons will have enough energy to ionize atoms … This becomes possible at a frequency just above that of visible light - ultraviolet light, and includes gamma radiation and x-rays. None of them are produced routinely by human technological gadgets.

Still you don’t have to disturb the brain at the atomic level to cause changes…

First of all, cell phones unquestionably heat up a small part of your brain - sort of similar to the way a microwave cooks via radiation. So what happens when you cook your brain a bit? As this site says

This thermal (heating) effect can cause headaches, fatigue, tissue swelling, tingling and other severe potential long-term damages.

Also, DNA can conduct electricity, and cell phones generate magnetic fields. So that might cause problems.

DNA damage (single- and double-strand breaks) was observed in the brain cells of rats exposed for two hours to a 60 Hz (cycles per second) magnetic field – the kind generated by household electric currents. This same type of DNA damage also occurred after a two-hour exposure to radiofrequency microwaves at power levels considered safe.

The researchers then found that this EMF-induced DNA damage could be blocked by treating the rats with antioxidants, including melatonin, immediately before and after exposure. Melatonin is a hormone secreted from the brain’s pineal gland. As a potent antioxidant, it effectively eliminates free radicals inside cells – suggesting that free radicals may play a role in the genetic damage caused by magnetic fields.

 

The effect of radiofrequency radiation on DNA could conceivably be more significant on neurons than on other cell types, because these nerve cells have a low capability for DNA repair, says Dr. Lai.

“Since nerve cells do not divide and are not likely to become cancerous, more likely consequences of DNA damage in nerve cells are changes in functions and cell death, which could either lead to or accelerate the development of neurodegenerative diseases.” (Glial cells, however, can become cancerous. These more numerous brain cells protect and support neurons.)[4]

He and Singh hypothesize that exposure to magnetic fields affects the balance of iron in brain cells, leading to an increase in free radicals.[5]

 any abnormal electromagnetic field produces a stress response. After prolonged exposure, the body’s stress response system can be exhausted and the immune system compromised. In such a state, animals and humans could become more susceptible to cancer and infectious diseases.

Dr. Becker refers to experiments conducted in the early 1980s by the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine that were reported in the September 1986 issue of Scientific American. Test animals were continuously exposed for long periods to microwaves at a power density twenty times lower than the safe thermal level. They developed a fourfold increase in cancers of the pituitary, thyroid, and adrenal glands – the primary organs through which the body mediates stress.

[The body gets easily stressed in response to magnetic fields.] …  preliminary results showed that “the energy required to induce stress proteins with low frequency EM fields is 14 orders of magnitude lower than required by temperature increase.[19]

 

Another pathway by which living organisms are influenced by radiofrequency radiation in a non-thermal way may be through an alteration in the activity of important enzymes. Enzymes are crucial because they act as catalysts to accelerate hundreds of thousands of metabolic reactions that would otherwise take place far too slowly to sustain life. Enzyme reaction rate is therefore a key factor in biochemical processes.

A well-studied example is ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), an enzyme involved in the regulation of cell growth. High ODC activity is characteristic of the unregulated growth of tumor cells, and ODC activity is sensitive to both extremely low frequency magnetic fields and to radiofrequency fields.[20,21]

Scientists are learning more and more about intracellular communication pathways. Signals originating at the cell membrane initiate a production sequence of enzyme “cascades” within the cell. These signaling pathways are proving to be sensitive to weak EMFs.[22,23]

There is indeed evidence that the parts brain are stressed. At this article points out, glucose metabolism increases in the part of the brain close to the cell phone while a cell phone is being used. The article links to this report.

Results Whole-brain metabolism did not differ between on and off conditions. In contrast, metabolism in the region closest to the antenna (orbitofrontal cortex and temporal pole) was significantly higher for on than off conditions (35.7 vs 33.3 μmol/100 g per minute; mean difference, 2.4 [95% confidence interval, 0.67-4.2]; P = .004). The increases were significantly correlated with the estimated electromagnetic field amplitudes both for absolute metabolism (R = 0.95, P < .001) and normalized metabolism (R = 0.89; P < .001).

Conclusions  50-minute cell phone exposure was associated with increased brain glucose metabolism in the region closest to the antenna. 

So increased glucose metabolism is evidence that something funky is going on in the part of your brain right next to the cell phone. We just don’t know what that is. The increase in metabolism may be related to the increase in oxidative stress as mentioned above. Oxidative stress can lead to cancer.

oxidative stress activates inflammatory pathways leading to transformation of a normal cell to tumor cell, tumor cell survival, proliferation, chemoresistance, radioresistance, invasion, angiogenesis

Oxidative stress can activate a variety of transcription factors including NF-κB, AP-1, p53, HIF-1α, PPAR-γ, β-catenin/Wnt, and Nrf2. Activation of these transcription factors can lead to the expression of over 500 different genes, including those for growth factors, inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, cell cycle regulatory molecules, and anti-inflammatory molecules.

So all in all, taking everything together, it’s an argument that since it isn’t really that hard to use a cell phone hands free, it feels like a relatively good idea.

    • #cancer
    • #health
    • #willwrites
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Iodine from seaweed, not pills?

Yeah, it’s totally true that eating seaweed is probably a gentler way to protect yourself from radiation than taking iodine pills :)

Of course this info is relevant to the Japanese and not the United States, as there is not really a radioactive food concern here. Anyway…people are already buying seaweed in California… 

Anyway, iodine pills have side effects which may include:

acne, loss of appetite, or upset stomach (especially during the first several days, as the body adjusts to the medication). More severe side effects which require notification of a physician are: fever, weakness, unusual tiredness, swelling in the neck or throat, mouth sores, skin rash, nausea, vomiting, stomach pains, irregular heartbeat, numbness or tingling of the hands or feet, or a metallic taste in the mouth

The LA times says:

A dose of potassium iodide contains about 100 mg of iodine [100000 mcg]

This article lists food based sources of iodine per 100g serving:

Different seaweeds contain varying amounts of iodine:

  • 62900mcg Hijiki
  • 7200mcg Dulse
  • 3200mcg Wakame
  • 2500mcg Kombu
  • 1600mcg Nori

The article also lists other fish and mollusks and eggs and milk - which have lower values for iodine content (up to 340 mcg for Haddock, for example), so foods other than seaweed aren’t really going to help. Also, you can’t really eat enough salt or cod liver oil to really get a meaningful amount of iodine, because it’s unhealthy to eat that much salt or cod liver oil. I’ve also seen some misconceptions. For example, kale isn’t that high in iodine.

This means that if you want to get as much iodine as you would from a pill, you’d have to buy hijiki seaweed, and eat 1.5 or 2 servings. It’s pretty much your only option if you want a huge amount of iodine - unless there is another high iodine seaweed not on this list.

You also have to be sure about your source of seaweed. Some Australian seaweed has already tested positive for iodine. It’s a similar situation in canada. So if you’re a serious health nut, you should probably order your seaweed online. Here’s an example of one Maine company that will ship seaweed to you.

    • #cancer
    • #food
    • #health
    • #willwrites
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

When I a doctor recommends something, I’m going to make sure it has a high success rate…from now on.

So getting prostate cancer screening may actually be more harmful/or at least no more helpful than ignoring your prostate

misleading tests results and treatment side effects … might in some cases cause more damage than the slow-growing disease.

To me this is interesting because it’s another example of how doctors often push treatment therapies and techniques that the medical industry sort of agrees with, not fulling knowing their success or failure rate…so it makes me feel like I should check up on doctors and make sure they are recommending proven high-success rate treatments…and not just pushing tests and other things that make big medicine money.

    • #health
    • #healthcare
    • #cancer
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

If a cancer doctor avoids airport scanners, then…

So this cancer doctor says of airport scanners :

“I’m a doctor at M.D. Anderson, and I don’t want radiation if I can avoid it,”

It’s pretty unasailable logic…so the cost is you have to wait a bit more and it takes a bit of extra effort and is generally a pain to do so …. Next flight I will try…

We will see what my tolerance for groping is like…

    • #health
    • #travel
    • #cancer
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Kind of horrid that my mattress could be giving me cancer

OK so polyurethane is a petroleum-based product used as a cushioning material in lots of mattresses. As thispage says:

Recent findings also showed that petroleum-based foam mattresses may be a source of cancer-causing chemicals. During use, all these foams break down in dangerous by-products: toxic dust under the bed and formaldehyde gas in the air.

 Additionally, the average mattress seems to contain around a pound of fire retardants called PDBE (polybrominated diphenyl ethers), already banned in Europe and the US. These PDBE have only been recently banned (January 2005) so the mattress you currently sleep on probably still contains them. Tests show that these chemicals may be especially toxic to kids, potentially affecting their hearing, memory and even intelligence after sleeping on PDBE-treated cribs.

More from this site:

PBDE’s are biomagnetic, meaning the toxins they release accumulate in a food chain. They can be inhaled via dust, passed from mother to child in utero, and ingested by infants via breast milk. PBDE’s have been shown to impair brain development, lead to birth defects, suppress the immune system, and cause cancer.

I feel like our politicians are sort of slacking when it comes to health. I have to wonder how much it would extra it would cost to make mattresses that don’t actually cause health problems in those who buy them. It isn’t so hard for regulators to ask these questions, but I haven’t heard them ask yet…

    • #cancer
    • #health
    • #household
    • #politics
  • 1 year ago
  • 2
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

beef hormones are linked to cancer

Apparently, unless you want to put a price-tag on your life via cancer Russian Roulette, it seems smart to only eat organic beef :

Research suggests a strong connection between some of the hormones given to cattle and cancer in humans, particularly breast cancer,” says Samuel Epstein, M.D., professor emeritus of environmental and occupational medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago School of Public Health. Specifically, the concern is that the estrogen-like agents used on cattle could increase your cancer risk, adds Ted Schettler, M.D., science director at the Science and Environmental Health Network. Though there are strong regulations about the use of hormones in cattle, “not all beef producers are following those regulations strictly, and some studies continue to find hormone residue in cattle,” Dr. Schettler says.

via huffpo

    • #food
    • #health
    • #cancer
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
(via http://xkcd.com/radiation/)
Pretty helpful, and yeah the most interesting stat is near the bottom, lowest 1 year dose linked to cancer, 100&#160;mSv. It&#8217;s also interesting that cell phone radiation is below measurable levels.
Pop-upView Separately

(via http://xkcd.com/radiation/)

Pretty helpful, and yeah the most interesting stat is near the bottom, lowest 1 year dose linked to cancer, 100 mSv. It’s also interesting that cell phone radiation is below measurable levels.

    • #health
    • #cancer
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Potential Cancer Fighter: Cordyceps Mushroom | Cinco Vidas

    • #cancer
    • #health
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Caramel Color in Soda Causes Cancer?

    • #cancer
    • #health
    • #food
  • 1 year ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
William Li: Can we eat to starve cancer? | Video on TED.com
This is a pretty cool talk about how some foods can cut your cancer risk by cutting abnormal angiogenesis.
Pop-upView Separately

William Li: Can we eat to starve cancer? | Video on TED.com

This is a pretty cool talk about how some foods can cut your cancer risk by cutting abnormal angiogenesis.

    • #cancer
    • #food
    • #health
  • 1 year ago
  • 1
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share

Swimming in chlorinated pools can lead to cancer: study

“The evidence of genotoxic effects were observed in 49 healthy adults after swimming for 40 minutes in a chlorinated indoor pool,” CREAL said in a statement on Monday.

    • #cancer
    • #exercise
    • #health
  • 2 years ago
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
← Newer • Older →
Page 1 of 6

Portrait/Logo

My Sites:

  Broaden Me
  Finding a Life Manual
  Food & Health Rethought
  Increasing Awareness
  Joking Around Having Fun
  Me on Google+
  Me on Quora

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr