clever UNICEF campaign: dirty water from vending machine
the General Social Survey (GSS) found that those who were against higher levels of government redistribution privately gave four times as much money, on average, as people who were in favor of redistribution. This is not all church-related giving; they also gave about 3.5 times as much to nonreligious causes. Anti-redistributionists gave more even after correcting for differences in income, age, religion and education. Of course, there are other ways to give than with money. Here again the results may be different from what you might expect. The GSS in 2002 showed that those who said the government was “spending too much money on welfare” were more likely to donate blood than those who said the government was “spending too little money on welfare.” The anti-redistributionists were also more likely to give someone directions on the street, return change mistakenly handed them by a cashier, and give food (or money) to a homeless person. So what does all this tell us? Contrary to the liberal stereotype of the hard-hearted right-winger, opposition to income-leveling is not evidence that one does not care about others. Quite the contrary. The millions of Americans who believe in limited government give disproportionately to others.
Panera Co. to open more pay-what-you-wish eateries - Yahoo! News
only the honor system kept them from taking all the food they wanted for free.
A month later, the verdict is in: It turns out people are basically good.
Its cashiers tell customers their orders’ “suggested” price based on the menu. About 60 to 70 percent pay in full, Shaich said. About 15 percent leave a little more and another 15 percent pay less, or nothing at all. A handful have left big donations, like $20 for a cup of coffee.
the restaurant will be able to cover its costs within months and eventually generate extra cash for charitable programs.
This is just pretty cool. It’s successful too.
zeltser: 'TAP In' or 'Buy Something Good'
This is my friend’s idea … Airports or malls could have kiosks where people could give to charity on the spur of the moment…it could encourage people to learn more about charities in their spare time, instead of browsing magazines…
Should You Give to Harvard? - The Moral of the Story Blog - NYTimes.com
Interesting article…
to summarize, you’re selfish if you give to Harvard because your dollars could do a lot more to help struggling people go to community college…
Quoting the comments and a followup article:
I imagine that most people who donate to colleges and universities do it out of gratitude or appreciation or loyalty; I know I do.
and
My donations to my alma mater are motivated by a sense of love and gratitude, not a rational computation of where the money is best spent.
One commenter argued we need elite schools to train leaders. There’s some truth there. Another argues back:
Millions of educated people who did not graduate from Harvard run the world. Why does the focus have to be on Harvard?
Yes, Harvard is also a research center, but there are other more direct ways to support research if that is your goal. And it’s true you can mark your money towards a specific purpose when you give, but I have to believe that with such large unconstrained endowments, Harvard pretty much sends money where they want to.
I think these comments really sum it up - people give for irrational reasons - i.e. it makes them feel good, and somehow connected to their school.


Me on Google+
Me on Quora